• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical)
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical)
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Recognition and reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions by surveyed healthcare professionals in Uganda: key determinants

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Kiguba-chs-res.pdf (908.9Kb)
    Date
    2014
    Author
    Kiguba, Ronald
    Karamagi, Charles
    Waako, Paul
    Ndagije, Helen B.
    Bird, Sheila M.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Objective: To assess extent and determinants of pastmonth recognition of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADR) and past-year ADR reporting among healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Uganda. Setting: Geographically diverse health facilities (public, private for-profit, private not-for-profit). Participants: Of 2000 questionnaires distributed, 1345 were completed: return rate of 67%. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Per cent HCPs who suspected ADR in the past month; reported ADR in the past year. Results: Nurses were the majority (59%, 792/1345). Only half the respondents had heard about pharmacovigilance: 39% of nurses (295/763; 95% CI 35% to 42%), 70% otherwise (383/547; 95% CI 66% to 74%). One fifth (268/1289 or 21%; 95% CI 19% to 23%) had suspected an ADR in the previous 4 weeks, 111 of them were nurses; 15% (190/1296) had reported a suspected ADR in the past year, 103 of them were nurses. Past-month ADR suspicion was more likely by non-nurses (OR=1.7, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.40) and with medical research involvement (OR=1.5, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.15) but past-month receipt of patient ADR-complaint predominated (OR=19, 95% CI 14 to 28). Past-year ADR reporting was higher by hospital staff (OR=1.9, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.10), especially in medicine (OR=2.3, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.73); but lower from private for-profit health facilities (OR=0.5, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.77) and by older staff (OR=0.6, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.91); more likely by HCPs who had ever encountered a fatal ADR (OR=2.9, 95% CI 1.94 to 4.25), knew to whom to report (OR=1.7, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.46), or suggested how to improve ADR reporting (OR=1.6, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.49). Two attitudinal factors were important: diffidence and lethargy.Conclusions: One in five HCPs suspected an ADR in the past-month and one in seven reported ADR in the previous year. Empowering patients could strengthen ADR detection and reporting in Africa.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/4398
    Collections
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV