• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical)
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical)
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Oral health promotion in schools: rationale and evaluation.

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Kizito-chs-res.pdf (125.6Kb)
    Date
    2013
    Author
    Kizito, Alex
    Caitlin, Meredith
    Wang, Yili
    Kasangaki, Arabat
    Macnab, Andrew J.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explain the rationale and potential for the WHO health promoting schools (HPS) to improve children’s oral health, and describe validated quantitative methodologies and qualitative approaches to measure program impact. Design/methodology/approach – Critical discussion of the impact of poor oral health and potential for school-based educational intervention, and evaluation methodologies used by the authors. Findings – Using HPS to improve oral health is relevant because dental caries and gingivitis/ periodontitis negatively impact children’s health and quality of life worldwide. WHO has called for effective community-based oral health promotion programs; intervention is simple and low cost; robust evaluation measures exist – the decayed missing filled teeth index and change in cavity rate allow quantitative comparison of oral health status; and questionnaires document changes in knowledge, practices, diet, health-related quality of life, and pain. Practical implications – Poor oral health is a major health issue. Established measures to improve oral hygiene offer an achievable, low-cost HPS entry point; the “knowledge” and “healthy practices” components central to the WHO HPS model are tried and tested and multiple potential benefits are documented. Poor oral health is a non-stigmatized issue, hence intervention is readily accepted, and effective evaluation tools provide evidence of program effect over a short (two to three years) timeframe. Originality/value – Oral health promotion is more affordable and sustainable than the cost of traditional restorative treatments especially in middle- and low-income countries. Success with oral health leads to confidence for expansion of HPS activities to address other health issues relevant to the school community.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/3281
    Collections
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV