Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKigozi, Godfrey
dc.contributor.authorH. Gray, Ronald
dc.contributor.authorWawer, Maria J.
dc.contributor.authorSerwadda, David
dc.contributor.authorMakumbi, Frederick
dc.contributor.authorWatya, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorNalugoda, Fred
dc.contributor.authorKiwanuka, Noah
dc.contributor.authorMoulton, Lawrence H.
dc.contributor.authorChen, Michael Z.
dc.contributor.authorSewankambo, Nelson K
dc.contributor.authorWabwire-Mangen, Fred
dc.contributor.authorBacon, Melanie C.
dc.contributor.authorRidzon, Renee
dc.contributor.authorOpendi, Pius
dc.contributor.authorSempijja, Victor
dc.contributor.authorSettuba, Absolom
dc.contributor.authorBuwembo, Denis
dc.contributor.authorKiggundu, Valerian
dc.contributor.authorAnyokorit, Margaret
dc.contributor.authorNkale, James
dc.contributor.authorKighoma, Nehemia
dc.contributor.authorCharvat, Blake
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-05T07:35:10Z
dc.date.available2013-07-05T07:35:10Z
dc.date.issued2008-06-03
dc.identifier.citationKigozi, G. et al (2008). The Safety of adult male circumcision in HIV-infected and uninfected men in Rakai, Uganda. Plos Medicine, 5(6):0911-0918en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050116
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10570/1761
dc.descriptionThe National Institutes of Health (NIH) (U1AI51171), The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (22006.02), and the Fogarty International Centeren_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The objective of the study was to compare rates of adverse events (AEs) related to male circumcision (MC) in HIV-positive and HIV-negative men in order to provide guidance for MC programs that may provide services to HIV-infected and uninfected men. Methods and Findings: A total of 2,326 HIV-negative and 420 HIV-positive men (World Health Organization [WHO] stage I or II and CD4 counts . 350 cells/mm3) were circumcised in two separate but procedurally identical trials of MC for HIV and/or sexually transmitted infection prevention in rural Rakai, Uganda. Participants were followed at 1–2 d and 5–9 d, and at 4–6 wk, to assess surgery-related AEs, wound healing, and resumption of intercourse. AE risks and wound healing were compared in HIV-positive and HIV-negative men. Adjusted odds ratios (AdjORs) were estimated by multiple logistic regression, adjusting for baseline characteristics and postoperative resumption of sex. At enrollment, HIV-positive men were older, more likely to be married, reported more sexual partners, less condom use, and higher rates of sexually transmitted disease symptoms than HIV-negative men. Risks of moderate or severe AEs were 3.1/100 and 3.5/100 in HIV-positive and HIV-negative participants, respectively (AdjOR 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47–1.74). Infections were the most common AEs (2.6/100 in HIVpositive versus 3.0/100 in HIV-negative men). Risks of other complications were similar in the two groups. The proportion with completed healing by 6 wk postsurgery was 92.7% in HIVpositive men and 95.8% in HIV-negative men (p¼0.007). AEs were more common in men who resumed intercourse before wound healing compared to those who waited (AdjOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.05–2.33). Conclusions: Overall, the safety of MC was comparable in asymptomatic HIV-positive and HIV-negative men, although healing was somewhat slower among the HIV infected. All men should be strongly counseled to refrain from intercourse until full wound healing is achieved.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.subjectMale circumcisionen_US
dc.subjectHIV-positive personsen_US
dc.subjectSexually transmitted diseasesen_US
dc.subjectCircumcision wounden_US
dc.titleThe Safety of adult male circumcision in HIV-infected and uninfected men in Rakai, Ugandaen_US
dc.typeJournal article, peer revieweden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record