• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Health Sciences (Health-Sciences)
    • School of Health Sciences (Health-Sciences) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Health Sciences (Health-Sciences)
    • School of Health Sciences (Health-Sciences) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The Safety of adult male circumcision in HIV-infected and uninfected men in Rakai, Uganda

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Journal Article (114.9Kb)
    Date
    2008-06-03
    Author
    Kigozi, Godfrey
    H. Gray, Ronald
    Wawer, Maria J.
    Serwadda, David
    Makumbi, Frederick
    Watya, Stephen
    Nalugoda, Fred
    Kiwanuka, Noah
    Moulton, Lawrence H.
    Chen, Michael Z.
    Sewankambo, Nelson K
    Wabwire-Mangen, Fred
    Bacon, Melanie C.
    Ridzon, Renee
    Opendi, Pius
    Sempijja, Victor
    Settuba, Absolom
    Buwembo, Denis
    Kiggundu, Valerian
    Anyokorit, Margaret
    Nkale, James
    Kighoma, Nehemia
    Charvat, Blake
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: The objective of the study was to compare rates of adverse events (AEs) related to male circumcision (MC) in HIV-positive and HIV-negative men in order to provide guidance for MC programs that may provide services to HIV-infected and uninfected men. Methods and Findings: A total of 2,326 HIV-negative and 420 HIV-positive men (World Health Organization [WHO] stage I or II and CD4 counts . 350 cells/mm3) were circumcised in two separate but procedurally identical trials of MC for HIV and/or sexually transmitted infection prevention in rural Rakai, Uganda. Participants were followed at 1–2 d and 5–9 d, and at 4–6 wk, to assess surgery-related AEs, wound healing, and resumption of intercourse. AE risks and wound healing were compared in HIV-positive and HIV-negative men. Adjusted odds ratios (AdjORs) were estimated by multiple logistic regression, adjusting for baseline characteristics and postoperative resumption of sex. At enrollment, HIV-positive men were older, more likely to be married, reported more sexual partners, less condom use, and higher rates of sexually transmitted disease symptoms than HIV-negative men. Risks of moderate or severe AEs were 3.1/100 and 3.5/100 in HIV-positive and HIV-negative participants, respectively (AdjOR 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47–1.74). Infections were the most common AEs (2.6/100 in HIVpositive versus 3.0/100 in HIV-negative men). Risks of other complications were similar in the two groups. The proportion with completed healing by 6 wk postsurgery was 92.7% in HIVpositive men and 95.8% in HIV-negative men (p¼0.007). AEs were more common in men who resumed intercourse before wound healing compared to those who waited (AdjOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.05–2.33). Conclusions: Overall, the safety of MC was comparable in asymptomatic HIV-positive and HIV-negative men, although healing was somewhat slower among the HIV infected. All men should be strongly counseled to refrain from intercourse until full wound healing is achieved.
    URI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050116
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/1761
    Collections
    • School of Health Sciences (Health-Sciences) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV