The Safety of adult male circumcision in HIV-infected and uninfected men in Rakai, Uganda
View/ Open
Date
2008-06-03Author
Kigozi, Godfrey
H. Gray, Ronald
Wawer, Maria J.
Serwadda, David
Makumbi, Frederick
Watya, Stephen
Nalugoda, Fred
Kiwanuka, Noah
Moulton, Lawrence H.
Chen, Michael Z.
Sewankambo, Nelson K
Wabwire-Mangen, Fred
Bacon, Melanie C.
Ridzon, Renee
Opendi, Pius
Sempijja, Victor
Settuba, Absolom
Buwembo, Denis
Kiggundu, Valerian
Anyokorit, Margaret
Nkale, James
Kighoma, Nehemia
Charvat, Blake
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: The objective of the study was to compare rates of adverse events (AEs) related to male circumcision (MC) in HIV-positive and HIV-negative men in order to provide guidance for MC programs that may provide services to HIV-infected and uninfected men. Methods and Findings: A total of 2,326 HIV-negative and 420 HIV-positive men (World Health Organization [WHO] stage I or II and CD4 counts . 350 cells/mm3) were circumcised in two separate but procedurally identical trials of MC for HIV and/or sexually transmitted infection prevention in rural Rakai, Uganda. Participants were followed at 1–2 d and 5–9 d, and at 4–6 wk, to assess surgery-related AEs, wound healing, and resumption of intercourse. AE risks and wound healing were compared in HIV-positive and HIV-negative men. Adjusted odds ratios (AdjORs) were estimated by multiple logistic regression, adjusting for baseline characteristics and postoperative resumption of sex. At enrollment, HIV-positive men were older, more likely to be married, reported more sexual partners, less condom use, and higher rates of sexually transmitted disease symptoms than HIV-negative men. Risks of moderate or severe AEs were 3.1/100 and 3.5/100 in HIV-positive and HIV-negative participants, respectively (AdjOR 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47–1.74). Infections were the most common AEs (2.6/100 in HIVpositive versus 3.0/100 in HIV-negative men). Risks of other complications were similar in the two groups. The proportion with completed healing by 6 wk postsurgery was 92.7% in HIVpositive men and 95.8% in HIV-negative men (p¼0.007). AEs were more common in men who resumed intercourse before wound healing compared to those who waited (AdjOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.05–2.33). Conclusions: Overall, the safety of MC was comparable in asymptomatic HIV-positive and HIV-negative men, although healing was somewhat slower among the HIV infected. All men should be strongly counseled to refrain from intercourse until full wound healing is achieved.