• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical)
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical)
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Assessment of biosafety and biorisk management practices among medical laboratory students in two institutions in Uganda

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Benson M-Biosafety and Biosecurity.pdf (980.0Kb)
    Date
    2022
    Author
    John, R Padde
    Winnie, Akiteng
    William, Edema
    Saad, M Atiku
    Julius, Tibyangye
    Job, Tekakwo
    Cosmas, Andruga
    Derick, Hope
    Benson, Musinguzi
    Jean, B Gesa
    Lawrence, Amadile
    Robert, Agondua
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Medical laboratory workers handle clinical specimens, which are a threat of exposure to infectious agents. Notably, medical laboratory science students report for internships with only theoretical knowledge of biosafety and biorisk management practices, predisposing them to a higher risk of laboratory hazards. In this study, we assessed the influence of entry‐level students' adherence to practices and attitudes towards biosafety and biorisk management during the Internship. An online survey tool was used to explore the practices and attitudes towards laboratory biosafety and risk management. Of the 96 students, 60 (62.5%) anonymous responses were received, and of these, 60.3% were direct entrants, and 32.8% were diploma entrants. Most (91.7%) of the students attended hospital internships, with 60.2% in Biosafety Level (BSL)‐2 laboratories and 70.2% rotating in all the core areas of laboratory medicine. The 8.3% who did not attend any internship were under the direct entry category. Exposure to biohazards was not significantly associated with laboratory safety level and student entry category (P> 0.05). Recommended laboratory biosafety practices were not significantly associated with the safety level of the laboratory and student entry category (P> 0.05). Poor attitudes towards certain laboratory biosafety practices were not significantly associated with the biosafety level of the training laboratory (P> 0.05), whereas training (P = 0.021) and clean‐up procedures (P = 0.048) were associated with laboratory safety levels, respectively. The direct entrants had no access to BSL‐3 laboratories, and this category of students had a negative attitude towards internship attendance. Therefore, there is a need to create a multi‐channel full range laboratory biosafety and biorisk management teaching reforms based on practical application, real case studies, and laboratory simulation to be incorporated into the curriculum to benefit the direct entrant.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/13289
    Collections
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV