Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoivin, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorBangirana, Paul
dc.contributor.authorKamya, Moses R.
dc.contributor.authorAchan, Jane
dc.contributor.authorAkello, Carolyne
dc.contributor.authorWong, Joseph K.
dc.contributor.authorBoal, Hannah E.
dc.contributor.authorRuel, Theodore D.
dc.contributor.authorHavlir, Diane V.
dc.contributor.authorCharlebois, Edwin
dc.contributor.authorEller, Leigh A.
dc.contributor.authorCao, Huyen
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-13T13:15:42Z
dc.date.available2012-04-13T13:15:42Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationBoivin, M. J. et al. (2010). HIV-subtype A is associated with poorer neuropsychological performance compared with subtype D in antiretroviral therapy-naive Ugandan children. AIDS, 24(8): 1163-1170en_US
dc.identifier.issn0269-9370
dc.identifier.issn1473-5571
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283389dcc
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10570/534
dc.description.abstractBackground: HIV-subtype D is associated with more rapid disease progression and higher rates of dementia in Ugandan adults compared with HIV-subtype A. There are no data comparing neuropsychological function by HIV subtype in Ugandan children. Design: One hundred and two HIV-infected antiretroviral therapy (ART) naive Ugandan children 6–12 years old (mean 8.9) completed the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, second edition (KABC-2), the Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA), and the Bruininks–Oseretsky Test for Motor Proficiency, second edition (BOT-2). Using a PCR-based multiregion assay with probe hybridization in five different regions (gag, pol, vpu, env, gp-41), HIV subtype was defined by hybridization in env and by total using two or more regions. Analysis of covariance was used for multivariate comparison. Results: The env subtype was determined in 54 (37 A, 16 D, 1 C) children. Subtype A andDgroups were comparable by demographics, CD4 status, andWHOstage. Subtype A infections had higher log viral loads (median 5.0 vs. 4.6, P¼0.02). Children with A performed more poorly than those with D on all measures, especially on KABC-2 Sequential Processing (memory) (P¼0.01), Simultaneous Processing (visual–spatial analysis) (P¼0.005), Learning (P¼0.02), and TOVA visual attention (P¼0.04). When adjusted for viral load, Sequential and Simultaneous Processing remained significantly different. Results were similar comparing by total HIV subtype. Conclusion: HIV subtype A children demonstrated poorer neurocognitive performance than those with HIV subtype D. Subtype-specific neurocognitive deficits may reflect age-related differences in the neuropathogenesis of HIV. This may have important implications for when to initiate ART and the selection of drugs with greater central nervous system penetration.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.subjectAttentionen_US
dc.subjectCD activationen_US
dc.subjectChildrenen_US
dc.subjectCognitive abilityen_US
dc.subjectEncephalopathyen_US
dc.subjectHIV cladesen_US
dc.subjectHome environmenten_US
dc.subjectMemoryen_US
dc.subjectMortaren_US
dc.subjectViral loaden_US
dc.titleHIV-subtype A is associated with poorer neuropsychological performance compared with subtype D in antiretroviral therapy-naive Ugandan childrenen_US
dc.typeJournal article, peer revieweden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record