• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences (CAES)
    • School of Agricultural Sciences (SAS)
    • School of Agricultural Sciences (SAS) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences (CAES)
    • School of Agricultural Sciences (SAS)
    • School of Agricultural Sciences (SAS) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Response of improved cassava varieties in Uganda to cassava mosaic disease (CMD) and their inherent resistance mechanisms

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Journal article (156.7Kb)
    Date
    2011
    Author
    Adriko, J.
    Sserubombwe, W.S.
    Adipala, E.
    Bua, A.
    Thresh, J.M.
    Edema, R.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Field based trials were setup to evaluate response and inherent resistance mechanisms to cassava mosaic disease (CMD) of four improved varieties; Nase 9, Nase 11, 00036 and 00057 together with Nase 4 and Bao as resistant and susceptible standards, respectively. These were grown in a CMD epidemic hotspot at Namulonge in Central Uganda. There were differences in sensitivity to CMD and whitefly populations among tested varieties. The improved varieties were less affected by CMD than the susceptible standard Bao. Three resistance mechanisms were exhibited by the varieties tested, namely; low infectibility (00036), recovery (Nase 9 and Nase 11) and reversion. Two of the varieties, that is, Nase 4 and 00057 showed all three resistance mechanisms. High whitefly populations characterized Bao, Nase 4 and 00057. Most of the varieties had a higher infestation of whiteflies on healthy than diseased plants. Results also showed that growth and yield parameters depended on the variety, growth stage at infection and health status of the cuttings used with improved varieties recording lower yield losses than the susceptible Bao. Also, plants infected earlier in the growth period suffered higher yield losses. Furthermore, plots planted from diseased cuttings recorded higher yield losses compared to those planted from healthy cuttings.
    URI
    http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/4620
    Collections
    • School of Agricultural Sciences (SAS) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV