Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHaule, Caspar
dc.contributor.authorOngom, Peter A
dc.contributor.authorKimuli, Timothy
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-25T07:04:32Z
dc.date.available2015-06-25T07:04:32Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationHaule C, et al. (2013). Efficacy of Gastrografin® compared with standard conservative treatment in management of adhesive small bowel obstruction at Mulago National Referral Hospital. Journal of Clinical Trials, 3 (43): 1-8.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2167-0870
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10570/4483
dc.description.abstractAbstract Introduction: The treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction is controversial, with both operative and nonoperative management practiced in different centers worldwide. Non-operative management is increasingly getting popular, though operative rates still remain high. A study to compare the efficacy of an oral water-soluble medium (Gastrografin®) with standard conservative management, both non-operative methods, in the management of this condition was conducted in a tertiary Sub Saharan hospital. Methods: An open randomised controlled clinical trial was conducted between September 2012 and March 2013 at Mulago National Referral and Teaching Hospital, Uganda. Fifty patients of both genders, with adhesive small bowel obstruction, in the hospital’s emergency and general surgical wards were included. Randomisation was to Gastrografin® and standard conservative treatment groups. The primary outcomes were: the time interval between admission and relief of obstruction, the length of hospital stay, and the rates of operative surgery. Results: All 50 recruited patients were followed up and analysed; 25 for each group. In the Gastrografin® group, 22 (88%) patients had relief of obstruction following the intervention, with 3 (12%) requiring surgery. The conservative treatment group had 16 (64%) patients relieved of obstruction conservatively, and 9 (36%) required surgery. The difference in operative rates between the two groups was not statistically significance (P = 0.67). Average time to relief of obstruction was shorter in the Gastrografin® group (72.52 hrs) compared to the conservative treatment group (117.75 hrs), a significant difference (P = 0.023). The average length of hospital stay was shorter in the Gastrografin® group (5.62 days) compared to the conservative treatment group (10.88 days), a significant difference (P = 0.04). Conclusion: The use of Gastrografin® in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction helps in earlier resolution of obstruction and reduces the length of hospital stay compared with standard conservative management. Its role in reducing the rate of laparotomies remains inconclusive.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTraining Health Researchers into Vocational Excellence in East Africa (THRIVE); Wellcome Trust.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOMICS Publishing Groupen_US
dc.subjectAdhesive small bowel obstructionen_US
dc.subjectNon-operative managementen_US
dc.subjectConservative managementen_US
dc.subjectGastrografinen_US
dc.subjectLaparotomiesen_US
dc.subjectHospital stayen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of Gastrografin® compared with standard conservative treatment in management of adhesive small bowel obstruction at Mulago National Referral Hospital.en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record