Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEkusai‑Sebatta, Deborah
dc.contributor.authorArinaitwe, Emmanuel
dc.contributor.authorMpimbaza, Arthur
dc.contributor.authorNankabirwa, Joaniter I.
dc.contributor.authorDrakeley, Chris
dc.contributor.authorRosenthal, Philip J.
dc.contributor.authorStaedke, Sarah G.
dc.contributor.authorMuyinda, Herbert
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-22T14:06:15Z
dc.date.available2023-11-22T14:06:15Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10570/12542
dc.description.abstractBackground: Travel is a well‑recognized risk factor for malaria. Within sub‑Saharan Africa, travelers from areas of lower to higher transmission intensity are potentially at high risk of malaria. Long‑lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are the primary tool for prevention of malaria, and their widespread use has contributed to substantial reductions in malaria burden. However, travellers often fail to use LLINs. To further explore the challenges and opportunities of using LLINs, travelers were interviewed in Uganda. Methods: In August and September 2019, 20 participants attending outpatient clinics at Naguru General Hospital in Kampala with a history of travel out of Kampala within the previous 60 days were purposively selected. Data were collected through in‑depth interviews and analyzed thematically using NVivo 12. Results: Of the 20 participants, 13 were male. Thirteen of the 20 participants tested positive for malaria by micros‑ copy, and 5 reported using of LLINs during travel. The main reasons for travel were to attend social events (weddings, funerals, overnight prayers) and for work. travelers who attended social events reported using LLINs less commonly than those who travelled for work. Challenges to using LLINs during travel included: (1) limited access to LLINs; (2) challenges in planning ahead of travel; (3) lack of space or ability to hang LLINs while travelling; (4) impression that LLINs in lodging places were unhygienic; (5) cultural beliefs discouraging use of LLINs during social events; (6) participation in overnight ceremonies; and (7) doubts about efficacy of LLINs. Positive factors influencing use of LLINs during travel included knowledge regarding malaria prevention and good affordability and availability of LLINs. Conclusions: Despite good traveler knowledge regarding malaria control measures, use of LLINs was limited. Use of LLINs in the prevention of malaria among travelers from low to high transmission settings needs to be prioritized. This calls for increased behavior change oriented communication to improve traveler preparedness and consideration of use of repellents in situations where LLINs may not be feasible. The Uganda Ministry of Health and Malaria Control Division should use educational messages to increase awareness about the risks of getting malaria during overnight travel through the media. Truck drivers should be sensitized through their companies to use the available space at the back of the trucks for hanging nets and consider using pop‑up nets. Keywords: Use of LLINs, Overnight travel, Malaria preventionen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMinistry of Healthen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.subjectLong‑lasting insecticidal netsen_US
dc.subjectInsecticidal netsen_US
dc.subjectPrevent malariaen_US
dc.subjectOvernight travelen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.subjectQualitative studyen_US
dc.titleChallenges and opportunities for use of long‑lasting insecticidal nets to prevent malaria during overnight travel in Uganda: a qualitative studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record