dc.contributor.author | Amponsah, Emmanuel Adjei | |
dc.contributor.author | Esuma, Williams | |
dc.contributor.author | Alicai, Titus | |
dc.contributor.author | Boache, Emmanuel Chamba | |
dc.contributor.author | Edema, Richard | |
dc.contributor.author | Onziga, Isaac Dramadri | |
dc.contributor.author | Adebo, Alfred Ozimati | |
dc.contributor.author | Agaba, Rolland | |
dc.contributor.author | Odong, Thomas L. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-18T08:03:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-04-18T08:03:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-08-23 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Amponsah, E. A., Esuma, W., Alicai, T., Boache, E. C., Edema, R., Onziga, I. D., ... & Odong, T. L. (2022). Genotype-by-environment interaction of yam (Dioscorea species) for yam mosaic virus resistance, dry matter content and yield in Uganda. Agronomy, 12(9), 1984. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2073-4395 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.3390/ agronomy12091984 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10570/11935 | |
dc.description | A research paper | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Often, yam cultivars grown in different agro-ecologies show differential responses across
production environments, a term known as "genotype-by-environment interaction. Such genotype-by-environment
interaction makes the selection of the best genotypes under varied production environments
more complex. This study evaluated twenty yam genotypes in six test environments to assess
genotype, environment, and their interaction effects on tuber yield, response to yam mosaic virus,
and dry matter content. The experiments were conducted over two seasons across three locations in
Uganda, using a randomized complete block design with three replications. There were significant
effects (p 0.001) for genotype (G), environment (E), and genotype-by-environment interaction for
all key traits assessed. Serere (2021) and Namulonge (2021) were identified as the most discriminating
and representative environments for testing responses to yam mosaic virus, respectively. Serere
(2021) was recognized as the most discriminating environment, whereas Arua (2021) emerged
closest to an ideal environment for assessing yam tuber yield. The tested genotypes also exhibited
resistance to yam mosaic virus disease, had high tuber yields and dry matter content. Genotypes
UGY16020, UGY16034, UGY16042, and UGY16080 demonstrated highest resistance to yam mosaic
virus disease, along with high yield and dry matter content, and are thus potential parents for yam
genetic improvement. Further evaluation of the four genotypes should be carried out within farmers’
production systems for selection, improvement, and release as new yam varieties for Uganda. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | SCIFSA
MaRCCI
SARI
NARO | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | MDPI | en_US |
dc.subject | Yams | en_US |
dc.subject | GxE Students | en_US |
dc.subject | Uganda’s yam | en_US |
dc.subject | Trait preferences | en_US |
dc.title | Genotype-by-environment interaction of yam (Dioscorea species) for yam mosaic virus resistance, dry matter content and yield in Uganda | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |