Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKarungi, Jackline
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-23T11:34:12Z
dc.date.available2023-01-23T11:34:12Z
dc.date.issued2022-10
dc.identifier.citationKarungi, J. (2022). Social networks for older adults with and without Alzheimer’s disease in Wakiso District; A comparative cross- sectional study. (Unpublished master's dissertation). Makerere University, Kampala, Ugandaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10570/11669
dc.description.abstractBackground: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the commonest cause of dementia with one case diagnosed every 4 seconds translating to about 10 million new cases per year globally. The majority of these cases live in Low and Middle Income Countries like Uganda. Small social networks have been associated with dementia in a number of studies. However, there is a huge knowledge gap about social networks for older adults in our setting. Objective: To compare social networks for older adults with and without Alzheimer's disease in Wakiso District, central Uganda. Methodology: This was a community cross-sectional study carried out in 23 villages of Wakiso District. Older adults aged ≥60 years were enrolled and assessed for cognitive impairment using the Mini Mental State Exam, a cut off of <24. A psychiatrist diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease was confirmed based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5. Social network characteristics were determined with the Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-R), total score of 60 with a cut off <24, for poor social networks. We compared AD and non-AD groups using bivariate and multivariable analysis with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Results: A total of 208 participants were enrolled. There were 64 participants diagnosed with AD compared to 144 participants without AD. The mean (SD) age in the AD and non-AD groups was 78.8 (9.8) and 72.8 (8.2) respectively; AOR; 4.39 (1.42-13.56) p<0.01. Half of the participants 32 (50.0%) in AD group were >80 years, versus a quarter 38 (26.4%) in the non-AD group. Poor social networks were worse in the AD group at 25(39.1%) compared to 40 (27.8%) in non-AD group, though this was not statistically significant. Participants with AD were contacted less by their relatives before making decisions; AOR; 6.22(1.12-4.14) p=0.049. Conclusion: The social networks were poorer among older adults in the AD group, though there was no statistical difference with the social networks in the non AD group in this study. Older adults with AD were less frequently contacted by relatives for decision making. We recommend community activities for older persons to improve social interaction and supporting shared decision making for older adults with AD and their caregivers.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health, US Department of State’s Office of the US Global AIDS Coordinator and Health Diplomacy (S/GAC), President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), Ruggles Scholarship Funden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMakerere Universityen_US
dc.subjectSocial networksen_US
dc.subjectAlzheimer's diseaseen_US
dc.subjectOlder adultsen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.titleSocial networks for older adults with and without Alzheimer’s disease in Wakiso District; A comparative cross- sectional studyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record