• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI)
    • Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI)
    • Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drug varies with formulation in the target population of children with HIV-1

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Research article (244.3Kb)
    Date
    2012-02-21
    Author
    Kasirye, P.
    Kendall, L.
    Adkison, K. K.
    Tumusiime, C.
    Ssenyonga, M.
    Bakeera-Kitaka, S.
    Nahirya-Ntege, P.
    Mhute, T.
    Kekitiinwa, A.
    Snowden, W.
    Burger, D. M.
    Gibb, D. M.
    Walker, A. S.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The bioequivalence of formulations is usually evaluated in healthy adult volunteers. In our study in 19 HIV-1-infected Ugandan children (1.8–4 years of age, weight 12 to <15 kg) receiving zidovudine, lamivudine, and abacavir solutions twice a day for ≥24 weeks, the use of scored tablets allowed comparison of plasma pharmacokinetics of oral solutions vs. tablets. Samples were collected 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h after each child’s last morning dose of oral solution before changing to scored tablets of Combivir (coformulated zidovudine + lamivudine) and abacavir; this was repeated 4 weeks later. Dosenormalized area under curve (AUC)0–12 and peak concentration (Cmax) for the tablet formulation were bioequivalent with those of the oral solution with respect to zidovudine and abacavir (e.g., dose-normalized geometric mean ratio (dnGMR) (tablet:solution) for zidovudine and abacavir AUC0–12 were 1.01 (90% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–1.18) and 0.96 (0.83– 1.12), respectively). However, lamivudine exposure was ~55% higher with the tablet formulation (AUC0–12 dnGMR = 1.58 (1.37–1.81), Cmax dnGMR = 1.55 (1.33–1.81). Although the clinical relevance of this finding is unclear, it highlights the impact of the formulation and the importance of conducting bioequivalence studies in target pediatric populations.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/899
    Collections
    • Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV