• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Education and External Studies (CEES)
    • East African School of Higher Education Studies and Development (EASHESD)
    • East African School of Higher Education Studies and Development (EASHESD) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Education and External Studies (CEES)
    • East African School of Higher Education Studies and Development (EASHESD)
    • East African School of Higher Education Studies and Development (EASHESD) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Examining student satisfaction in universities in Uganda using the European Customer Satisfaction Index (ECSI) Model

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    PhD Thesis (2.560Mb)
    Date
    2021-04
    Author
    Kyoshaba, Martha
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Student Satisfaction (SS) is fundamental for the survival of any university because it may enhance student loyalty, the recruitment of students, student performance and completion rates. In addition, it boosts the image of a university, giving the university competitive advantage, hence enhancing its profitability. I examined SS in universities in Uganda using the European Customer Satisfaction Index (ECSI) model. Thus I developed four hypotheses (H1-H4). H1 was to the effect that University Image (UI), Student Expectations (SE), Service Quality of Infrastructure and Tangible Service Elements (SQITSE), Service Quality of People and Processes (SQPP) and Perceived Value of Investment (PVI) positively predict SS. H2 was to the effect that UI, SE, SQITSE and SQPP positively predict PVI. H3 was to the effect that UI, SS and SQPP positively predict SL; and H4 was to the effect that UI positively predicts SE. I developed a self-administered questionnaire to which a sample of 704 students from seven universities in Uganda responded. I analyzed the validity and reliability of my constructs using confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach alpha respectively. In addition, I analyzed my data in three levels; univariate, bivariate and multivariate. At univariate level, I used frequencies, percentages and means. At bivariate level, I used the student’s Two-sample t Test, Analysis of Variance, Pearson’s linear correlation, scatter graphs and simple linear regression (SLR). Finally at multivariate level I used multiple linear regression (MLR). In particular, I tested hypotheses H1, H2 and H3 using MLR and H4 using SLR. I confirmed all my four hypotheses (H1-H4) except that in H1, one construct SQITSE did not predict SS. I concluded that SS depended on UI, SE, SQPP and PVI. In turn PVI depended on UI, SE, SQITSE and SQPP. Furthermore that SL depended on UI, SS and SQPP and finally that SE depended on UI. Based on my conclusions, I supported the ECSI model in explaining SS and recommended that in order to enhance SS in universities in Uganda, university authorities need to allocate resources to the predictors of SS (i.e., UI, SE, SQPP and PVI) which in turn would enhance SL.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/8989
    Collections
    • East African School of Higher Education Studies and Development (EASHESD) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV