• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Engineering, Design, Art and Technology (CEDAT)
    • School of Built Environment (SBE)
    • School of Built Environment (SBE) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Engineering, Design, Art and Technology (CEDAT)
    • School of Built Environment (SBE)
    • School of Built Environment (SBE) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The construction of the apron at Arua Airfield (Phase 2)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Masters Thesis (2.911Mb)
    Date
    2019-07
    Author
    Byekwaso, Robert Ssengonzi
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This report is about the Construction of the Apron at Arua Airfield-Phase 2 project, under which the author did participate as Project Manager on the Contractor’s team (Construction Manager). Detailed construction approach employed, and aspects of construction project management practice adopted during the execution phase are also included in the report. The areas discussed at length include the measures I took to ensure the project objectives in terms of cost, quality, time, safety and environment aspects were achieved during the execution of the project. By the time of writing this report, works were still in progress, with project performance rated at physical progress of 75% of planned activities versus 85% of the approved time. The project coverage was 36,000m2 with major activities involving earthworks, pavement construction and marking, drainage works, installation firefighting gadgets, kerb installation and painting. All activities were planned to cost UGX 4,613,676,938/=, within an execution period that varied from 3 months to 11 months and defects liability period of six months. This report therefore covers the period from contract award to the pavement construction stage. Ancillary works were yet to be executed. The financial status had been upheld as executed work was valued at UGX3.55 billion (76% of contract value) despite variations in the project. Overall the execution and management of project was a success. Gantt charts were used to manage and control time as concentration was always given to critical activities. Quality was achieved by following standards, specifications and work methods and close supervision. Costs were also managed through timely resourcing of the activities using the rates provided for the activities. The author ensured proper involvement of all stakeholders in project and smooth flow of information during the period of project execution.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/7493
    Collections
    • School of Built Environment (SBE) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV