• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences (CAES)
    • School of Forestry, Environmental and Geographical Sciences (SFEGS)
    • School of Forestry, Environmental and Geographical Sciences (SFEGS) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences (CAES)
    • School of Forestry, Environmental and Geographical Sciences (SFEGS)
    • School of Forestry, Environmental and Geographical Sciences (SFEGS) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Breaking the law? Illegal livelihoods from a protected area in Uganda

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Journal Article (477.7Kb)
    Author
    Tumusiime, David Mwesigye
    Vedeld, Paul
    Gombya-Ssembajjwe, William
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Forests are important to local livelihoods and regulating access to forests will have consequences to those livelihoods and may promote illegal harvesting. This study analyses how local people make a living, focusing on the illegal collection of a forest's resources following its declaration as a Protected Area (PA). A household survey was conducted between October and December 2005, combining semi-structured individual household interviews and village level focus group discussions. Six sub-counties bordering the Rwenzori Mountain National Park in Uganda were chosen at random and two sample villages randomly selected from each. Through a participatory wealth ranking exercise, all the individual households in each sample village were assigned to one of three categories: rich, medium or poor. From this stratified list five individual households were randomly selected from each category for semi-structured interviews. Household livelihood outcomes were assessed and a fractional logit regression was used to estimate factors influencing dependency on forest income. Households with less access to assets exhibited greater dependence on forest resources. The average household was poor with a per adult equivalent unit income of 0.5 USD/day, with 18.6% of their income being derived from environmental resources. Based on income per adult equivalent unit, households were divided into poor and less poor. Both categories reported illegal collection of forest products. The poor households derived 32% of their environmental income and 12% of their total income from the park compared to the less poor at 18% and 4.5% respectively. The park resources reduced income inequality, as well as the incidence and depth of poverty by 2.8, 3.0, and 5.0 percentage points, respectively. Small reductions in the incidence of poverty suggest that forest resources may not be reliable as a pathway out of poverty, but the poverty depth measure shows that forest resources have a significant impact on helping to make the poor less poor. Under such circumstances, our observation is that increased law enforcement alone is unlikely to protect the park. Interventions that allow managed access to these resources in the short term, whilst creating operational opportunities outside the areas to cater for local peoples' rights and needs in the longer term may be more suitable.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/6158
    10.1016/j.forpol.2011.02.001
    Collections
    • School of Forestry, Environmental and Geographical Sciences (SFEGS) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV