Diagnostic Accuracy and Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Methods for Detection of Soil-Transmitted Helminths in a Post-Treatment Setting in Western Kenya
View/ Open
Date
2014Author
Assefa, Liya M.
Crellen, Thomas
Kepha, Stella
Kihara, Jimmy H.
Njenga, Sammy M.
Pullan, Rachel L.
Brooker, Simon J.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Objectives: This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the Kato-Katz and Mini-FLOTAC methods
for detection of soil-transmitted helminths (STH) in a post-treatment setting in western Kenya. A cost analysis also explores
the cost implications of collecting samples during school surveys when compared to household surveys.
Methods: Stool samples were collected from children (n = 652) attending 18 schools in Bungoma County and diagnosed by
the Kato-Katz and Mini-FLOTAC coprological methods. Sensitivity and additional diagnostic performance measures were
analyzed using Bayesian latent class modeling. Financial and economic costs were calculated for all survey and diagnostic
activities, and cost per child tested, cost per case detected and cost per STH infection correctly classified were estimated. A
sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the impact of various survey parameters on cost estimates.
Results: Both diagnostic methods exhibited comparable sensitivity for detection of any STH species over single and
consecutive day sampling: 52.0% for single day Kato-Katz; 49.1% for single-day Mini-FLOTAC; 76.9% for consecutive day
Kato-Katz; and 74.1% for consecutive day Mini-FLOTAC. Diagnostic performance did not differ significantly between
methods for the different STH species. Use of Kato-Katz with school-based sampling was the lowest cost scenario for cost
per child tested ($10.14) and cost per case correctly classified ($12.84). Cost per case detected was lowest for Kato-Katz used
in community-based sampling ($128.24). Sensitivity analysis revealed the cost of case detection for any STH decreased nonlinearly
as prevalence rates increased and was influenced by the number of samples collected.
Conclusions: The Kato-Katz method was comparable in diagnostic sensitivity to the Mini-FLOTAC method, but afforded
greater cost-effectiveness. Future work is required to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of STH surveillance in different settings.