• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Public Health (Public-Health)
    • School of Public Health (Public-Health) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Public Health (Public-Health)
    • School of Public Health (Public-Health) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Client-provider interactions in provider-initiated and voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Uganda

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Wanyenze-chs-res.pdf (146.5Kb)
    Date
    2013
    Author
    Wanyenze, Rhoda K.
    Kyaddondo, David
    Kinsman, John
    Makumbi, Fredrick
    Colebunders, Robert
    Hardon, Anita
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: Provider-initiated HIV testing and counselling (PITC) is based on information-giving while voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) includes individualised client-centered counseling. It is not known if the providerclient experiences, perceptions and client satisfaction with the information provided differs in the two approaches. Methods: In 2008, we conducted structured interviews with 627 individuals in Uganda; 301 tested through PITC and 326 through voluntary counselling and testing (VCT). We compared client experiences and perceptions based on the essential elements of consent, confidentiality, counseling, and referral for follow-up care. We conducted multivariate analysis for predictors of reporting information or counselling as sufficient. Results: In VCT, 96.6% (282) said they were asked for consent compared to 91.3% (198) in PITC (P = 0.01). About the information provided, 92.0% (286) in VCT found it sufficient compared to 78.7% (221) in PITC (P = <0.01). In VCT 79.9% (246) thought their results were kept confidential compared to 71.7% (200) in PITC (P = 0.02). Eighty percent (64) of HIV infected VCT clients said they were referred for follow-up care versus 87.3% (48) in PITC (p = 0.2). Predictors of perceived adequacy of information in PITC included an opportunity to ask questions (adj.RR 1.76, CI 1.41, 2.18) and expecting the test results received (adj.RR 1.18, CI 1.06, 1.33). For VCT significant factors included being given an opportunity to ask questions (adj.RR 1.62, CI 1.00, 2.60) and 3+ prior times tested, (adj.RR 1.05, CI 1.00, 1.09). Conclusions: This study demonstrates good practices in the essential elements of HIV testing for both VCT and PITC. However, further quality enhancement is required in both testing approaches in relation to referral to HIV care post-test, client confidence in relation to confidentiality, and providing an opportunity to ask questions to address client-specific information needs.
    URI
    http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/13/423
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/2124
    Collections
    • School of Public Health (Public-Health) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV