• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Public Health (Public-Health)
    • School of Public Health (Public-Health) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Public Health (Public-Health)
    • School of Public Health (Public-Health) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Cost-effectiveness analysis of self-injectable versus health worker-administered injectable contraceptive modalities among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) at Kajjansi Health Center IV Wakiso District

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Master's Dissertation (2.436Mb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Nzamunganyiki, Denis
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: Globally, injectable contraceptives are valued for their safety and convenience, with self-injection further enhancing accessibility. However, the cost-effectiveness of self-injectables compared to intramuscular methods remains unclear. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of self-injectable versus health worker-administered DMPA to evaluate its economic and practical benefits. Objectives: To assess the incremental costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of self-injectable versus health worker-administered injectable contraceptive modalities among women aged 15-49 at Kajjansi Health Center IV. Methods: The study compared self-injectable and health worker-administered contraceptive modalities over a one-and-a-half-year period using a Decision Tree model from a societal perspective. Costs were estimated by identifying and valuing resources for each modality, while effectiveness was measured in terms of unintended pregnancies averted. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) calculations and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess robustness under different scenarios and willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. Results: The self-injectable contraceptive method had a total cost of $557 and prevented 145 pregnancies, while the health worker-administered method cost $527 and prevented 140 pregnancies. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 750 indicates that self-injection provides greater effectiveness for a modest cost increase. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the results across various scenarios, supporting the cost-effectiveness of the self-injectable method. Conclusions and Recommendations: Self-injection was a more cost-effective contraceptive modality, preventing more unintended pregnancies at a slightly higher cost compared to health worker-administered injections. These findings provide evidence to support resource allocation decisions and improvements in contraceptive modalities at Kajjansi Health Center IV and similar settings.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/14715
    Collections
    • School of Public Health (Public-Health) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV