• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences (CAES)
    • School of Forestry, Environmental and Geographical Sciences (SFEGS)
    • School of Forestry, Environmental and Geographical Sciences (SFEGS) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences (CAES)
    • School of Forestry, Environmental and Geographical Sciences (SFEGS)
    • School of Forestry, Environmental and Geographical Sciences (SFEGS) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Drivers of spatial and temporal mangrove forest change in Mombasa, Tana River, and Lamu Counties in Kenya

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Master's dissertation (2.411Mb)
    Date
    2024
    Author
    Odire, Omondi Erick
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This study assessed mangrove forest cover change and their associated drivers on the Kenyan coast. Geographic Information Systems and Remote Sensing including Machine Learning techniques were used to map the extent and change of mangrove forests for the years 2001, 2011 and 2021 in Mombasa, Tana River and Lamu Counties of Kenya. Binary Logistic Regression was applied together with the results of mangrove forest dynamics to model the drivers of mangrove dynamics in the three respective counties. The results showed that there was a significant difference in mangrove forest coverage in the three respective counties (P < 0.05). Mombasa County had the least average mangrove coverage (1,138 ha) and the highest mangrove loss (65%) which was attributed to the influence of anthropogenic activities. Lamu County had the highest mean mangrove coverage (32,119 ha) in addition to being more stable in terms of mangrove dynamics whereas Tana River County exhibited a tremendous gain in mangrove coverage (28%) from 2001 to 2021. The drivers of mangrove dynamics in Kenya included population density, coastal developments, proximity to protected areas, proximity to major roads and surface temperature although these factors varied from one county to the other. It is therefore recommended that mangrove conservation and protection efforts be tailor-made to specific areas as the drivers of the dynamics are site-specific for example in Mombasa County where anthropogenic factors are responsible for mangrove loss, the community should be involved in the conservation and restoration of mangroves, whereas in Tana River County, more research should be carried out to identify how the erosion of riverbanks can be addressed to reduce mortality of mangroves.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/14425
    Collections
    • School of Forestry, Environmental and Geographical Sciences (SFEGS) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV