Impact of Public Debt on Private Investment in East Africa: Do Institutions Matter?

dc.contributor.author Aswata, Millicent Bridgit
dc.date.accessioned 2019-11-13T08:51:58Z
dc.date.available 2019-11-13T08:51:58Z
dc.date.issued 2018-09-27
dc.description A dissertation submitted to the Directorate of Research and Graduate Training in partial fulfilment of the award of the degree of Master of Arts in Economics of Makerere University en_US
dc.description.abstract The East African countries have ambitious development strategies to transform their economies to high income levels. In order to realize these high economic growth levels, governments have put in place development strategies to boost public investment in mega infrastructural projects, institutions and various incentives to augment private sector development. Larger percentages of these governments’ budgets are financed by public debt which may impact on Private Investment. Domestic borrowing may crowd out private investors and continued debt accumulation may also result in high taxation rates to service debt. With the increasing public investment, development of institutions, ventures like the structural adjustment programmes, and highly indebted poor countries initiatives, the private investment have not realized much output. Taking into account that there is increasing infrastructural development, then public debt is bound to rise. However, institutions may play a role in the efficient allocation of resources and lowering the cost of doing business. This study, using a panel of four countries for the period between 1992 to 2015, with ARDL Panel Model using data from World Bank and IMF databases, established that Public Debt crowds-out Private Domestic Investment and Foreign Direct Investment in the long run. The magnitude of the impact is greater for Private Domestic Investment compared to Foreign Direct Investment. In order to bring out the importance of institutions in determining Private Investment levels, corruption-control is interacted with public debt. The regressions with the interaction term indicate that both PDI and FDI improve when institutional quality improves. Since corruption control is seen to improve the private investment levels, governments need to enhance efficiency in resource utilization for public programmes that compliment Private Investment. Credit availability to private sector, GDP and corruption-control were found to be significant and positively related to Private Domestic Investment. Therefore policies in line with an improvement in fiscal policies, financial development, good governance and general macro-economic stability would be crucial in promoting Private Investment in East Africa. KEY WORDS: Public Debt, Private Domestic Investment, Foreign Direct Investment, Corruption-control en_US
dc.description.sponsorship AERC-Government of Kenya en_US
dc.identifier.citation Aswata, M. B. (2018). Impact of Public Debt on Private Investment in East Africa: Do Institutions Matter?. Unpublished masters thesis. Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10570/7605
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Makerere University en_US
dc.subject Public debt en_US
dc.subject Private investment en_US
dc.subject East Africa en_US
dc.subject EAC countries en_US
dc.subject Private domestic investments en_US
dc.subject Foreign direct investment en_US
dc.subject Corruption control en_US
dc.title Impact of Public Debt on Private Investment in East Africa: Do Institutions Matter? en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
Files