• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and BioSecurity (CoVAB)
    • School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Resources (SVAR)
    • School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Resources (SVAR) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and BioSecurity (CoVAB)
    • School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Resources (SVAR)
    • School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Resources (SVAR) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Prevalence of Influenza A viruses in livestock and free-living waterfowl in Uganda.

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Research article (383.0Kb)
    Date
    2014
    Author
    Kirunda, H.
    Erima, Bernard
    Byarugaba, D. K.
    Byaruhanga, Achilles
    Wabwire-Mangen, Fred
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: Avian influenza viruses may cause severe disease in a variety of domestic animal species worldwide, with high mortality in chickens and turkeys. To reduce the information gap about prevalence of these viruses in animals in Uganda, this study was undertaken. Results: Influenza A virus prevalence by RT-PCR was 1.1% (45/4,052) while seroprevalence by ELISA was 0.8% (24/2,970). Virus prevalence was highest in domestic ducks (2.7%, 17/629) and turkeys (2.6%, 2/76), followed by free-living waterfowl (1.3%, 12/929) and swine (1.4%, 7/511). A lower proportion of chicken samples (0.4%, 7/1,865) tested positive. No influenza A virus was isolated. A seasonal prevalence of these viruses in waterfowl was 0.7% (4/561) for the dry and 2.2% (8/368) for the wet season. In poultry, prevalence was 0.2% (2/863) for the dry and 1.4% (24/1,713) for the wet season, while that of swine was 0.0% (0/159) and 2.0% (7/352) in the two seasons, respectively. Of the 45 RT-PCR positive samples, 13 (28.9%) of them were H5 but none was H7. The 19 swine sera positive for influenza antibodies by ELISA were positive for H1 antibodies by HAI assay, but the subtype(s) of ELISA positive poultry sera could not be determined. Antibodies in the poultry sera could have been those against subtypes not included in the HAI test panel. Conclusions: The study has demonstrated occurrence of influenza A viruses in animals in Uganda. The results suggest that increase in volumes of migratory waterfowl in the country could be associated with increased prevalence of these viruses in free-living waterfowl and poultry.
    URI
    http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/10/50
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/4463
    Collections
    • School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Resources (SVAR) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV