Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGolooba-Mutebi, Frederick
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-05T07:23:13Z
dc.date.available2013-07-05T07:23:13Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.citationGolooba-Mutebi, F. (2005). When popular participation won't improve service provision: primary health care in Uganda. Development Policy Review, 23(2): 165-182en_US
dc.identifier.issn0950-6764
dc.identifier.issn1467-7679
dc.identifier.urihttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dpr.2005.23.issue-2/issuetoc
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2005.00281.x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10570/1733
dc.description.abstractAdvocates of participatory approaches to service delivery see devolution as key to empowering people to take charge of their own affairs. Participation is portrayed as guaranteeing the delivery of services that are in line with user preferences. It is assumed that people are keen to participate in public affairs, that they possess the capacity to do so, and that all they need is opportunities. Using evidence from ethnographic research in Uganda, this article questions these views. It shows that, to succeed in the long term, devolution and participation must take place in the context of a strong state, able to ensure consistent regulation, and a well-informed public backed up by a participatory political cultureen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
dc.subjectPrimary Health Care - Ugandaen_US
dc.titleWhen popular participation won't improve service provision : primary health care in Ugandaen_US
dc.typeJournal article, peer revieweden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record