• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and BioSecurity (CoVAB)
    • School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Resources (SVAR)
    • School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Resources (SVAR) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and BioSecurity (CoVAB)
    • School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Resources (SVAR)
    • School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Resources (SVAR) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparative study of Ziehl Neelsen and Auramine-O staining methods for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Research article (120.0Kb)
    Date
    2010
    Author
    Oromcan, B.W.
    Atuhaire, D.W.
    Ekuka, G
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This study cross sectional study was designed to compare the performance of Ziehl Neelsen staining and Auramine fluorescent microscopy staining techniques in detecting the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum. Sputum specimens were collected in screw-capped plastic bottles. Un-concentrated and concentrated sputum specimens were stained using Ziehl Neelsen and Auramine-O technique in both cases. The stained smears were examined for the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Chi-square test was used to show whether there was a relationship or no relationship. Descriptive statistics were used to present the data inform of tables. The findings showed that both Ziehl Neelsen and Auramine-O preparations each showed 5.6% of positive cases and there was a significant relationship between both techniques (P=0.0000). However, 20% of cases showed false positive with Ziehl Neelsen concentrate technique and 30% showed false positive with Auramine-O concentrate preparation. There was a significant relationships in the performance of Ziehl Neelsen and Auramine-O techniques in the detection of AFB, although Auramine-O showed a greater false positive than Ziehl Neelsen method in the detection of AFB (P= 0.0000). Both Ziehl Neelsen and Auramine-O techniques can be used in the detection of AFB in this study population. However, Auramine-O technique should remain a method of choice in this study population whenever dealing with few samples because it showed a greater sensitivity than Ziehl Neelsen method in the detection of AFB.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/13237
    Collections
    • School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Resources (SVAR) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV