Gender and adaptive capacity to climate change among small holder farmers in Nabilatuk District, Karamoja Sub Region Uganda
Abstract
This study sought to establish the relationship between gender and adaptive capacity to drought
among smallholder farmers in Nabilatuk district, Karamoja sub-region, eastern Uganda. The
specific objectives were to i) analyse the effects of drought on agricultural livelihoods and
gender relations among smallholder farmers in Lolachat and Nabilatuk Sub-counties; ii)
establish the resources that men and women in smallholder farming access and control to
withstand the drought; iii) explore the infrastructure and technologies that men and women
farmers use to withstand drought; and iv) explore the existing institutions and social networks
supportive of men and women smallholder farmers to withstand drought. The study drew on
two theories: The Disasters Risk Theory, which states that disasters like drought destroy
livelihoods, and the Feminist Political Ecology Theory, which argues that gender is a crucial
variable in adaptation to drought. Using a cross sectional research design, quantitative data was
collected from a random sample of 161 men and 231 women in Lolachat and Nabilatuk Subcounties in Nabilatuk district. This was complemented with qualitative data obtained from Key
Informant interviews, In-depth interviews, Focus Group Discussions and observation.
Findings indicated that drought is a big challenge for the survival of women and men
smallholder farmers. Such challenges manifest differently according to gender. Women and
girls, for instance, experienced more work burdens than men because they became more
vulnerable during the drought period. Men, on the other hand, had low adaptive capacity as
they experienced reduced pastoral activities due to drought that pushed them to crop farming,
ordinarily a female-dominated activity. The findings indicate that there are multiple resources
in the study sites, for example, water, livestock and rangelands. However, the drought has had
a significant impact on water resources, forcing women to walk long distances to access water.
Men resort to the sale of livestock at low prices, which results in low adaptive capacity among
livestock farmers. As the drought intensifies, more women than men adopted the use of
traditional labour-intensive technologies which limited women’s adaptive capacity during the
drought. The study also shows that institutions like Non-Government Organisations (NGOs)
discriminate against women in trainings meant for improving their adaptive capacity, which
made women more vulnerable to drought than men. Conclusively, the drought has caused
women farmers to have low adaptive capacity to the ravaging effects of prolonged droughts
than men. In addition to the available adaptation strategies in Nabilatuk district, it is important
that the development partners and government agents working in Karamoja subregion avail
farmers with drought tolerant crops and livestock which can resist the drought and increase
their adaptive capacity. In addition, there is a need to develop a policy for resilience building
in Nabilatuk district to reduce vulnerabilities and increase adaptive capacity among men and
women in smallholder farming.