Improving the Sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay on sputum pellets by decreasing the amount of added sample reagent: a laboratory and clinical evaluation

dc.contributor.author Dharan, Nila J.
dc.contributor.author Amisano, Danielle
dc.contributor.author Mboowa, Gerald
dc.contributor.author Ssengooba, Willy
dc.contributor.author Blakemore, Robert
dc.contributor.author Kubiak, Rachel W.
dc.contributor.author Armstrong, Derek T.
dc.contributor.author Jones, Martin
dc.contributor.author Manabe, Yukari C.
dc.contributor.author Joloba, Moses L.
dc.contributor.author Ellner, Jerrold J.
dc.contributor.author Dorman, Susan E.
dc.contributor.author Alland, David
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-22T08:26:35Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-22T08:26:35Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.description.abstract The Xpert MTB/RIF(Xpert) assay permits rapid near-patient detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum; however, the test sensitivity remains suboptimal in paucibacillary specimens that are negative for acid-fast bacilli using smear microscopy. Xpert testing includes dilution with sample reagent, and when processed sputum pellets are tested, the recommended sample reagent/pellet ratio is 3:1. We evaluated whether a decreased sample reagent/pellet ratio of 2:1 increased Xpert sensitivity compared to the recommended3:1. The limit of detection was determined by inoculating serial dilutions of M. tuberculosis into sputum samples,preparing sputum pellets, and testing each pellet by Xpert at both sample reagent ratios. Processed sputum pellets obtained from M.tuberculosis culture-positive clinical specimens were also tested by Xpert at both ratios. Among spiked sputum pellets, the limit of detection was 1,478 CFU/ml (95% confidence interval [CI], 1,211 to 1,943) at a 3:1 ratio and decreased to 832 CFU/ml(95%CI,671to1,134)at2:1. The proportion of specimens in which M.tuberculosis was detected was greater at 2:1 than at 3:1 for almost all numbers of CFU/ml;this difference was most prominentat lower numbers of CFU/ml.Among134concentrated sputum pellets from the clinical study, the sensitivity of Xpert at 2:1 was greater than at 3:1 overall (80% versus 72%; P 0.03) and for smear-negative specimens (67% versus 58%; P 0.12).For Xpert testing of sputum pellets,using a lower sample reagent/pellet ratio increased M. tuberculosis detection, especially for paucibacillary specimens. Our study supports use of a 2:1 sample reagent/pellet dilution for Xpert testing of sputum pellets. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Dharan, N.J. et al. (2015). Improving the Sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay on sputum pellets by decreasing the amount of added sample reagent: a laboratory and clinical evaluation. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 53(4), 1258-1263. en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.1128/jcm.03619-14
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10570/14551
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher American Society for Microbiology en_US
dc.subject Mycobacterium tuberculosis en_US
dc.subject Sputum test en_US
dc.subject Tuberculosis en_US
dc.subject TB en_US
dc.subject Xpert MTB/RIF en_US
dc.subject PCR-based diagnostic en_US
dc.subject Paucibacillary specimens en_US
dc.title Improving the Sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay on sputum pellets by decreasing the amount of added sample reagent: a laboratory and clinical evaluation en_US
dc.type Article en_US
Files