Informed consent practices for surgical care at university teaching hospitals; A case in a low resource setting.

dc.contributor.author Ochieng, Joseph
dc.contributor.author Ibingira, Charles
dc.contributor.author Buwembo, William
dc.contributor.author Munabi, Ian
dc.contributor.author Kiryowa, Haruna
dc.contributor.author Kitara, David
dc.contributor.author Bukuluki, Paul
dc.contributor.author Nzarubara, Gabriel
dc.contributor.author Mwaka, Erisa
dc.date.accessioned 2015-06-24T06:36:35Z
dc.date.available 2015-06-24T06:36:35Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.description.abstract Abstract Background Informed consent in medical practice is essential and a global standard that should be sought at all the times doctors interact with patients. Its intensity would vary depending on the invasiveness and risks associated with the anticipated treatment. To our knowledge there has not been any systematic review of consent practices to document best practices and identify areas that need improvement in our setting. The objective of the study was to evaluate the informed consent practices of surgeons at University teaching Hospitals in a low resource setting. Methods A cross-sectional study conducted at three university teaching hospitals in Uganda. Selfguided questionnaires were left at a central location in each of the surgical departments after verbally communicating to the surgeons of the intention of the study. Filled questionnaires were returned at the same location by the respondents for collection by the research team. In addition, 20 in-depth interviews were held with surgeons and a review of 384 patients’ record files for informed consent documentation was done. Results A total of 132 (62.1%) out of 214 questionnaires were completed and returned. Respondents were intern doctors, residents and specialists from General surgery, Orthopedic surgery, Ear, Nose and Throat, Ophthalmology, Dentistry, Obstetrics and Gynaecology departments. The average working experience of respondents was 4.8 years (SD 4.454, range 0–39 years). 48.8% of the respondents said they obtained consent all the time surgery is done while 51.2% did not obtain consent all the time. Many of the respondents indicated that informed consent was not obtained by the surgeon who operated the patient but was obtained either at admission or by nurses in the surgical units. The consent forms used in the hospitals were found to be inadequate and many times signed at admission before diagnosing the patient’s disease. Conclusions Informed consent administration and documentation for surgical health care is still inadequate at University teaching hospitals in Uganda. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship MESAU MEPI Programmatic Award (No: 1R24TW008886); Fogarty International Center. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Ochieng, J. (2014). Informed consent practices for surgical care at university teaching hospitals; A case in a low resource setting. BMC Medical Ethics 2014, 15:40. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1472-6939
dc.identifier.uri doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-40
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10570/4473
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BioMed Central en_US
dc.subject Informed consent practices en_US
dc.subject Surgery en_US
dc.subject Uganda en_US
dc.subject Medical practice en_US
dc.title Informed consent practices for surgical care at university teaching hospitals; A case in a low resource setting. en_US
dc.type Journal article en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ochieng-chs-res.pdf
Size:
134.76 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: