An assessment of the efficacy of the mining and minerals Act Cap. 159 towards securing the rights of artisanal and small scale miners in Uganda: a case study of Rubanda District

Abstract

This study assessed both the efficacy and effectiveness of the Mining and Minerals Act Cap.159 towards securing the rights of artisanal and small-scale miners (ASM) as well as evaluated the ability of the existing enforcement framework, with a view of informing mineral sector reforms in Uganda. Despite the legal recognition and formalization of ASM under the Act, field evidence revealed persistent challenges that undermine the realization of these rights. Guided by the public interest theory of regulation and the human rights framework for decent work, the study explored the extent to which the Act addresses the rights of miners, the functionality of institutional structures, and the barriers hindering implementation. The study adopted qualitative methods of data collection; document review, key informant interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs). Findings from key informant interviews and FGDs revealed that while the Act was enacted to replace outdated legislation and improve the welfare of artisanal and small-scale miners (ASM), its implementation remains ineffective. Three years after enactment, many miners remain unaware of the law due to limited dissemination, absence of translations, and lack of community engagement. Furthermore, the absence of supporting regulations, particularly those governing artisanal mining operations, has made licensing and enforcement impractical. The study also found that institutional coordination is weak, with unclear roles among enforcement agencies, underfunded district-level natural resource offices, and inadequate logistical support. A key finding of this study is that current policy and legislative efforts tend to prioritize compliance with international standards rather than directly addressing the ongoing human rights violations experienced by artisanal and small-scale miners—violations the Act was originally intended to

prevent. In reality, the legal reforms appear to prioritize revenue generation through non-tax revenues (NTRs), licensing, permits and taxation rather than ensuring the protection of miners’ rights. Miners continue to face exploitative market conditions, unsafe working environments, and limited legal awareness, conditions reminiscent of the pre-reform era. The research concludes that without an effective implementation strategy, goodwill and institutional commitment, the Act is unlikely to achieve its intended outcomes. The study recommends comprehensive sensitization campaigns, translation and distribution of the law, expedited development of artisanal mining regulations, and better funding for enforcement and oversight institutions. It also calls for capacity building for the Police Minerals Protection Unit, clear role demarcation among stakeholders, and protection of ASMs from exploitative monopolistic buyers. Strengthening these areas will be critical in transforming ASM into a rights-respecting and economically sustainable sector.