Artemether-lumefantrine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for treatment of malaria: a randomized trial.

dc.contributor.author Kamya, Moses.R
dc.contributor.author Yeka, Adoke
dc.contributor.author Bukirwa, Hasifa
dc.contributor.author Lugemwa, Myers
dc.contributor.author Rwakimari, John B.
dc.contributor.author Staedke, Sarah G.
dc.contributor.author Talisuna, Ambrose O.
dc.contributor.author Greenhouse, Bryan
dc.contributor.author Nosten, Francois
dc.contributor.author Rosenthal, Philip J.
dc.contributor.author Wabwire-Mangen, Fred
dc.contributor.author Dorsey, Grant
dc.date.accessioned 2012-02-02T15:19:44Z
dc.date.available 2012-02-02T15:19:44Z
dc.date.issued 2007-05-18
dc.description.abstract Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Uganda. Design: Randomized single-blinded clinical trial. Setting: Apac, Uganda, an area of very high malaria transmission intensity. Participants: Children aged 6 mo to 10 y with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Intervention: Treatment of malaria with AL or DP, each following standard 3-d dosing regimens. Outcome measures: Risks of recurrent parasitemia at 28 and 42 d, unadjusted and adjusted by genotyping to distinguish recrudescences and new infections. Results: Of 421 enrolled participants, 417 (99%) completed follow-up. The unadjusted risk of recurrent falciparum parasitemia was significantly lower for participants treated with DP than for those treated with AL after 28 d (11% versus 29%; risk difference [RD] 18%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 11%–26%) and 42 d (43% versus 53%; RD 9.6%, 95% CI 0%–19%) of follow-up. Similarly, the risk of recurrent parasitemia due to possible recrudescence (adjusted by genotyping) was significantly lower for participants treated with DP than for those treated with AL after 28 d (1.9% versus 8.9%; RD 7.0%, 95% CI 2.5%–12%) and 42 d (6.9% versus 16%; RD 9.5%, 95% CI 2.8%–16%). Patients treated with DP had a lower risk of recurrent parasitemia due to non-falciparum species, development of gametocytemia, and higher mean increase in hemoglobin compared to patients treated with AL. Both drugs were well tolerated; serious adverse events were uncommon and unrelated to study drugs. Conclusion: DP was superior to AL for reducing the risk of recurrent parasitemia and gametocytemia, and provided improved hemoglobin recovery. DP thus appears to be a good alternative to AL as first-line treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Uganda. To maximize the benefit of artemisinin-based combination therapy in Africa, treatment should be integrated with aggressive strategies to reduce malaria transmission intensity. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This investigation received financial support from the US Centers for Disease Control under Cooperative Agreement Number U50/CCU925122–01 and, from Malaria Consortium Drugman, SUBK0001 with support from the Department for International Development (DFID). Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine study drugs were provided free of charge by Holleypharm, China. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Kamya, M.R., Yeka, A., Bukirwa, H., Lugemwa, M., Rwakimari, J.B., Staedke, S.G., Talisuna, A.O., Greenhouse, B., Nosten, F., Rosenthal, P.J., Wabwire-Mangen, F., Dorsey, G. (2007). Artemether-lumefantrine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for treatment of malaria: a randomized trial. PLoS Clinical Trials, 2(5) en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1555-5887
dc.identifier.uri doi:10. 1371/journal.pctr.0020020
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10570/377
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Malaria en_US
dc.subject Uganda en_US
dc.subject Artemisinin-based compound therapy (ACT) en_US
dc.subject Children en_US
dc.subject Malaria recurrence en_US
dc.title Artemether-lumefantrine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for treatment of malaria: a randomized trial. en_US
dc.type Journal article, peer reviewed en_US
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: