Artemisinin Combination Therapies for Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria in Uganda

dc.contributor.author Bukirwa, Hasifa
dc.contributor.author Talisuna, Ambrose
dc.contributor.author Yeka, Adoke
dc.contributor.author Kamya, Moses R
dc.contributor.author Talisuna, Ambrose O.
dc.contributor.author Banek, Kristin
dc.contributor.author Bakyaita, Nathan
dc.contributor.author Rwakimari, John Bosco
dc.contributor.author Rosenthal, Philip J.
dc.contributor.author Wabwire-Mangen, Fred
dc.contributor.author Dorsey, Grant
dc.contributor.author Staedke, Sarah G.
dc.date.accessioned 2012-02-02T16:11:42Z
dc.date.available 2012-02-02T16:11:42Z
dc.date.issued 2006-05
dc.description.abstract Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of artemisinin combination therapies for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Uganda. Design: Randomized single-blind controlled trial. Setting: Tororo, Uganda, an area of high-level malaria transmission. Participants: Children aged one to ten years with confirmed uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria. Interventions: Amodiaquine þ artesunate or artemether–lumefantrine. Outcome Measures: Risks of recurrent symptomatic malaria and recurrent parasitemia at 28 days, unadjusted and adjusted by genotyping to distinguish recrudescences and new infections. Results: Of 408 participants enrolled, 403 with unadjusted efficacy outcomes were included in the per-protocol analysis. Both treatment regimens were highly efficacious; no recrudescencesoccurred in patients treated with amodiaquine þ artesunate, and only two occurred in those treated with artemether–lumefantrine. However, recurrent malaria due to new infections was common. The unadjusted risk of recurrent symptomatic malaria was significantly lower for participants treated with artemether–lumefantrine than for those treated with amodiaquine þ artesunate (27% versus 42%, risk difference 15%, 95% CI 5.9%–24.2%). Similar results were seen for the risk of recurrent parasitemia (51% artemether–lumefantrine versus 66% amodiaquineþ artesunate, risk difference 16%, 95% CI 6.2%–25.2%). Amodiaquine þ artesunate and artemether–lumefantrine were both well-tolerated. Serious adverse events were uncommon with both regimens. Conclusions: Amodiaquine þ artesunate and artemether–lumefantrine were both highly efficacious for treatment of uncomplicated malaria. However, in this holoendemic area, despite the excellent performance of both regimens in terms of efficacy, many patients experienced recurrent parasitemia due to new infections. Artemether–lumefantrine was superior to amodiaquine þ artesunate for prevention of new infections. To maximize the benefit of artemisinin combination therapy in Africa, treatment should be integrated with strategies to prevent malaria transmission. The impact of frequent repeated therapy on the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of new artemisinin regimens should be further investigated. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Association of Schools of Public Health cooperative agreement, ‘‘Malaria Surveillance and Control in Uganda’’ (SA3569 and S1932–21/21), and the Department for International Development (DFID) provided financial support for this study. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Bukirwa, H., Yeka, A., Kamya, M.R., Talisuna, A.O., Banek, K., Bakyaita, N., Wabwire-Mangen, F., Rwakimari, J.B., Staedke, S.G., Rosenthal, P.J., Dorsey, G. (2006). Artemisinin combination therapies for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Uganda. PLoS Clinical Trials, 1(1) en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1555-5887
dc.identifier.uri DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr. 0010007
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10570/379
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Public Library of Science en_US
dc.subject Malaria parasites en_US
dc.subject Chloroquine drugs en_US
dc.subject Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) en_US
dc.subject Uganda en_US
dc.subject Uncomplicated falciparum malaria en_US
dc.subject Malaria en_US
dc.title Artemisinin Combination Therapies for Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria in Uganda en_US
dc.type Journal article, peer reviewed en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
bukirwa-yeka-chs-res.pdf
Size:
139.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: