• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Medicine (Sch. of Med.)
    • School of Medicine (Sch. of Med.) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Medicine (Sch. of Med.)
    • School of Medicine (Sch. of Med.) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Evaluation of the modified alvarado score as a diagnostic tool for appendicitis

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Thesis, Masters, Preliminary pages (2.716Mb)
    Thesis, Masters, Chapter iv (2.102Mb)
    Thesis, Masters, Chapter v part-1 (2.672Mb)
    Thesis, Masters, Chapter v part-2 (3.276Mb)
    Thesis, Masters, Chapter vi (3.280Mb)
    Thesis, Masters, Chapter vii-references (2.311Mb)
    Thesis, Masters, Appendices (1.496Mb)
    Thesis, Masters, Chapters i-iii (3.618Mb)
    Date
    2005
    Author
    Nyeko, John Filbert
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: Decision making in cases of acute appendicitis may be difficult especially for junior surgeons. This was reflected in the high negative appendicectomy rate in Mulago hospital. Modified Alvarado Scoring System (MASS) was helpful in minimizing unnecessary appendicectomies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of MASS as a diagnostic tool for appendicitis. Patients and methods: All patients aged 13 years and above who were admitted with a provisional diagnosis of appendicitis into Mulago Hospital, Kampala Uganda, over the period of October 2004 to April 2004 were prospectively entered into the study. The study included 204 patients between the ages 13 and 84 years. They were prospectively evaluated on admission using the Modified Alvarado Score System (MASS) to determine whether or not they had acute appendicitis. The MASS was correlated with the operative and histopathological findings. Results: 151 patients (74.0%) had appendicectomies of which 24 patients (15.9%) had normal appendices on histopathology examination. Overall the MASS showed a sensitivity of 71.3% and a specificity of 62.55%. For males the sensitivity was 72.4% and the specificity was 50.0%. For females the sensitivity and specificity were 69.0% and 68.8% respectively. Conclusion: From the results, the MASS is not sufficiently valid to be adopted as a sole method of diagnosing acute appendicitis in adults in out environment. Rather it can be used for screening cases that may require further radiological evaluation. Further requirements may be needed to improve its sensitivity and specificity.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/885
    Collections
    • School of Medicine (Sch. of Med.) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV