• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Humanities and Social Sciences (CHuSS)
    • School of Liberal and Performing Arts (SLPA)
    • School of Liberal and Performing Arts (SLPA) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Humanities and Social Sciences (CHuSS)
    • School of Liberal and Performing Arts (SLPA)
    • School of Liberal and Performing Arts (SLPA) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Challenges facing public policy implementation in areas of insurgency and displaced people: A case study of Northern Uganda Reconstruction Program (1992-1999) in Gulu District

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Acen-CHUSS-Master.pdf (405.4Kb)
    Date
    2009
    Author
    Acen, Betty
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Public policy formulation is a very significant stage in the course of public policy development and success. For the policy to be realistic and workable, its design should carry the content, which makes it possible for the planned policy to be implemented. When identify the implementation inadequacies, the questions that one needs to bear in mind, is the course of the implementation failure. Northern Uganda reconstruction programme (NURP I) brings across the message of the importance of public policy formulation or design. There is need to dig deep in the public policy and identify the factors that are responsible for challenging public policy formulation. NURP I as a public policy was affected so much because of its design and approach. The project objectives appear very complex. It was understood that the special situation in the North required a multi-track effort. The challenge was not only to build infrastructure but to increase the potential for sustained security in an area which had become socially and economically isolated. In designing a policy to suit the prevailing conditions of war, in Northern Uganda, considerations would have been made to adapt the emergency rehabilitation of infrastructure affected by the war, rather than aiming at medium term reconstruction and capacity building. It is noticed that insecurity was a problem from the start (during designing) and it remained a problem throughout implementation. It should also be noted that the approach that was used in NURP policy design greatly affected its implementation. During policy design, the people to whom the policy was to be applied were not consulted, it was not right and fair to design a policy which did not consider the immediate needs of the people. Both the designers and implementers of NURP I as a public policy were people who did not experience the life o the people in the NURP area.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/3615
    Collections
    • School of Liberal and Performing Arts (SLPA) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV