• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI)
    • Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI)
    • Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Significant pharmacokinetic interactions between artemether/lumefantrine and efavirenz or nevirapine in HIV-infected Ugandan adults

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    byakika-kibwika-lamorde-idi-res.pdf (274.4Kb)
    Date
    2012
    Author
    Byakika-Kibwika, Pauline
    Lamorde, Mohammed
    Mayito, Jonathan
    Nabukeera, Lillian
    Namakula, Rhoda
    Mayanja-Kizza, Harriet
    Katabira, Elly
    Ntale, Muhammad
    Pakker, Nadine
    Ryan, Mairin
    Hanpithakpong, Warunee
    Tarning, Joel
    Lindegardh, Niklas
    Khoo, Saye
    Back, David
    Merry, Concepta
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Objectives: Co-administration of artemether/lumefantrine with antiretroviral therapy has potential for pharmacokinetic drug interactions. We investigated drug–drug interactions between artemether/lumefantrine and efavirenz or nevirapine. Methods: We performed a cross-over study in which HIV-infected adults received standard six-dose artemether/lumefantrine 80/480 mg before and at efavirenz or nevirapine steady state. Artemether, dihydroartemisinin, lumefantrine, efavirenz and nevirapine plasma concentrations were measured and compared. Results: Efavirenz significantly reduced artemether maximum concentration (Cmax) and plasma AUC (median 29 versus 12 ng/mL, P,0.01, and 119 versus 25 ng.h/mL, P,0.01), dihydroartemisinin Cmax and AUC (median 120 versus 26 ng/mL, P,0.01, and 341 versus 84 ng.h/mL, P,0.01), and lumefantrine Cmax and AUC (median 8737 versus 6331 ng/mL, P¼0.03, and 280370 versus 124381 ng.h/mL, P,0.01). Nevirapine significantly reduced artemether Cmax and AUC (median 28 versus 11 ng/mL, P,0.01, and 123 versus 34 ng.h/mL, P,0.01) and dihydroartemisinin Cmax and AUC (median 107 versus 59 ng/mL, P,0.01, and 364 versus 228 ng.h/mL, P,0.01). Lumefantrine Cmax and AUC were non-significantly reduced by nevirapine. Artemether/lumefantrine reduced nevirapine Cmax and AUC (median 8620 versus 4958 ng/mL, P,0.01, and 66329 versus 35728 ng.h/mL, P,0.01), but did not affect efavirenz exposure. Conclusions: Co-administration of artemether/lumefantrine with efavirenz or nevirapine resulted in a reduction in artemether, dihydroartemisinin, lumefantrine and nevirapine exposure. These drug interactions may increase the risk of malaria treatment failure and development of resistance to artemether/lumefantrine and nevirapine. Clinical data from population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic trials evaluating the impact of these drug interactions are urgently needed
    URI
    doi:10.1093/jac/dks207
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/943
    Collections
    • Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV