• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Health Sciences (Health-Sciences)
    • School of Health Sciences (Health-Sciences) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Health Sciences (Health-Sciences)
    • School of Health Sciences (Health-Sciences) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Artemisinin Combination Therapies for Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria in Uganda

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    bukirwa-yeka-chs-res.pdf (139.6Kb)
    Date
    2006-05
    Author
    Bukirwa, Hasifa
    Talisuna, Ambrose
    Yeka, Adoke
    Kamya, Moses R
    Talisuna, Ambrose O.
    Banek, Kristin
    Bakyaita, Nathan
    Rwakimari, John Bosco
    Rosenthal, Philip J.
    Wabwire-Mangen, Fred
    Dorsey, Grant
    Staedke, Sarah G.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of artemisinin combination therapies for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Uganda. Design: Randomized single-blind controlled trial. Setting: Tororo, Uganda, an area of high-level malaria transmission. Participants: Children aged one to ten years with confirmed uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria. Interventions: Amodiaquine þ artesunate or artemether–lumefantrine. Outcome Measures: Risks of recurrent symptomatic malaria and recurrent parasitemia at 28 days, unadjusted and adjusted by genotyping to distinguish recrudescences and new infections. Results: Of 408 participants enrolled, 403 with unadjusted efficacy outcomes were included in the per-protocol analysis. Both treatment regimens were highly efficacious; no recrudescencesoccurred in patients treated with amodiaquine þ artesunate, and only two occurred in those treated with artemether–lumefantrine. However, recurrent malaria due to new infections was common. The unadjusted risk of recurrent symptomatic malaria was significantly lower for participants treated with artemether–lumefantrine than for those treated with amodiaquine þ artesunate (27% versus 42%, risk difference 15%, 95% CI 5.9%–24.2%). Similar results were seen for the risk of recurrent parasitemia (51% artemether–lumefantrine versus 66% amodiaquineþ artesunate, risk difference 16%, 95% CI 6.2%–25.2%). Amodiaquine þ artesunate and artemether–lumefantrine were both well-tolerated. Serious adverse events were uncommon with both regimens. Conclusions: Amodiaquine þ artesunate and artemether–lumefantrine were both highly efficacious for treatment of uncomplicated malaria. However, in this holoendemic area, despite the excellent performance of both regimens in terms of efficacy, many patients experienced recurrent parasitemia due to new infections. Artemether–lumefantrine was superior to amodiaquine þ artesunate for prevention of new infections. To maximize the benefit of artemisinin combination therapy in Africa, treatment should be integrated with strategies to prevent malaria transmission. The impact of frequent repeated therapy on the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of new artemisinin regimens should be further investigated.
    URI
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr. 0010007
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/379
    Collections
    • School of Health Sciences (Health-Sciences) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV