dc.contributor.author | Pintye, Jillian | |
dc.contributor.author | Davey, Dvora L. Joseph | |
dc.contributor.author | Wagner, Anjuli D. | |
dc.contributor.author | John-Stewart, Grace | |
dc.contributor.author | Baggaley, Rachel | |
dc.contributor.author | Bekker, Linda-Gail | |
dc.contributor.author | Celum, Connie | |
dc.contributor.author | Chi, Benjamin H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Coates, Thomas J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Groves, Allison K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Haberer, Jessica E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Heffron, Renee | |
dc.contributor.author | Kinuthia, John | |
dc.contributor.author | Matthews, Lynn T. | |
dc.contributor.author | McIntyre, James A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Moodley, Dhayendre | |
dc.contributor.author | Mofenson, Lynne M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mugo, Nelly | |
dc.contributor.author | Mujugira, Andrew | |
dc.contributor.author | Myer, Landon | |
dc.contributor.author | Shoptaw, Steven | |
dc.contributor.author | Stranix-Chibanda, Lynda | |
dc.contributor.author | Baeten, Jared M. | |
dc.contributor.author | PrEP in Pregnancy Working Group | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-03T09:14:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-07-03T09:14:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Pintye, J. et al. (2020). Defining gaps in pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery for pregnant and post-partum women in high-burden settings using an implementation science framework. The Lancet HIV, 7 (8): e582-e592. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | 10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30102-8 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10570/14624 | |
dc.description.abstract | Pregnancy is a high-risk period for HIV acquisition in African women, and pregnant women who become acutely infected with HIV account for up to a third of vertical HIV transmission cases in African settings. To protect women and eliminate vertical transmission, WHO recommends offering oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) based on tenofovir to HIV-negative pregnant and post-partum women with a substantial risk of HIV acquisition. PrEP implementation for pregnant and post-partum women lags behind implementation for other high-risk populations. Unique considerations for PrEP implementation arise during pregnancy and post partum, including the integration of provider training with clinical delivery and monitoring of PrEP exposure and outcomes within existing maternal health systems, yet scarce implementation data are available to generate evidence in this context. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | University of Washington’s Center for AIDS Research (CFAR),
The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (P30 AI027757 to JMB, R01 AI125498 to GJS and JMB, K24 AI120796 to BHC, and R01 AI131060 to BHC),
The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD100201 to JP and R01 HD094630 to GJS),
The National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH095507 to JMB, R01 MH116771 to TC, and K01 MH121124 to ADW), and
The Fogarty International Center (K01 TW011187 to DJD). | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.subject | Pre-exposure prophylaxis | en_US |
dc.subject | Post-partum women | en_US |
dc.subject | Pregnant women | en_US |
dc.subject | HIV acquisition | en_US |
dc.subject | HIV transmission | en_US |
dc.subject | Implementation science | en_US |
dc.subject | Breastfeeding | en_US |
dc.subject | PMTCT | en_US |
dc.subject | Prevention of mother to child transmission | en_US |
dc.title | Defining gaps in pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery for pregnant and post-partum women in high-burden settings using an implementation science framework | en_US |
dc.type | Research Article | en_US |