• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical)
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical)
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Clindamycin resistance among methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus isolated from human and respective household swine in greater Kabale Region—South Western Uganda

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Research Article (1.085Mb)
    Date
    2019
    Author
    Baguma, Andrew
    Musinguzi, Benson
    Mpeirwe, Moses
    Bazira, Joel
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Introduction: S. aureus is recognized as the common cause of nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Macrolide-Lincosamide-Streptogramin B (MLSB) is thought to be alternative therapies against MRSA infections. Clindamycin is the most favored agent because of exceptional pharmacokinetic characteristics. However, increasing resistance to clindamycin among MRSA strains is a serious challenge. The current study investigated the profile of clindamycin resistance among MRSA isolates from Humans, and their respective livestock (in particular swine) using D-test in greater Kabale region. Materials and Methods: Three hundred phenotypic MRSA isolates previously isolated from Humans and swine were confirmed by mecA PCR. We performed D-test using erythromycin (15 μg) and clindamycin (2 μg) discs in accordance to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) protocol. Results: Of all 300 MRSA isolates, 6% (n = 18) were sensitive to Erythromycin and Clindamycin (S). The rate of inducible clindamycin resistance (iMLSB) was 42% (n = 125) and 38% (n = 115) was resistance to both Erythromycin and clindamycin (cMLSB). However, 14% (n = 42) were resistant to erythromycin but sensitive to clindamycin (MS) without “D” zone negative. Conclusion: Clindamycin resistance (both cMLSB and iMLSB) among MRSA was high and “D” test should be adopted routinely during antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disc diffusion testing to rapidly detect iMLSB and cMLSB.
    URI
    https://doi.org/10.4236/aid.2019.94022
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/13255
    Collections
    • School of Bio-Medical Sciences (Bio-Medical) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV